Evaluation of accessibility at Lollapalooza Chile (2023–2024): A quantitative analysis of the experience of people with disabilities attending the festival
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.53382/issn.2810-6369.46Keywords:
accessibility, people with disabilities, mass events, music festivalsAbstract
Accessibility at large-scale music events (LME) is key to the cultural citizenship of people with disabilities (PwD), yet quantitative, context-specific evidence in Latin America is scarce. Objective. To describe perceived accessibility and inclusion among PwD at Lollapalooza Chile (2023–2024) and compare results by edition and disability group. Methods. Quantitative phase of a mixed-methods study; cross-sectional on-site survey using intercept sampling in adapted areas and, when observable, at other points. Convenience samples: 2023 (n=68) and 2024 (n=95). Instrument included 1–7 rating scales and open-ended questions. We computed descriptives and two indices: a General Accessibility Index (10 items) and a Services–Core Index (10 comparable items: P22, P23 harmonized, P25b, P26–P32). Comparisons 2023 vs. 2024 used Mann–Whitney U (Holm adjustment within item families); comparisons by disability type (Physical vs. Other) used Kruskal–Wallis. Complete-case analyses; no weights or imputation; α=0.05. Results. We analyzed 163 surveys. The General Index increased from 4.5 to 4.9 (p=0.026) and the Services–Core Index from 4.6 to 5.1 (p=0.039). After Holm adjustment, comparative items rating Lollapalooza against previous editions and other LMEs remained significant. No significant differences by disability group were found in either index. P24 and P25a were reported descriptively only due to low coverage/asymmetric measurement. Conclusions. From 2023 to 2024 there was a significant, broad-based improvement in perceived accessibility, consistent with operational adjustments by the festival; the lack of differences by disability type suggests a cross-cutting impact, to be interpreted cautiously given nonprobability sampling and possible underrepresentation of non-visible disabilities. We recommend institutionalizing co-design with PwD, strengthening accessible communication, and adopting verifiable standards for LMEs. The qualitative phase, to be published separately, will help triangulate perceived mechanisms of improvement.
References
Alvarado, K. (2022) Accessibility of music festivals: a British perspective, International Journal of Event & Festival Management, 13(2): 203–218. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEFM-12-2020-0082.
Cancino González, P. M., Reinoso Aguiló, A. K., & Rojas Rodríguez, C. E. (2017). La variable de discapacidad en la política cultural en Chile: balances y desafíos. Revista Chilena de Terapia Ocupacional, 1(1), 125–131. https://doi.org/10.5354/0719-5346.2017.46385
Congreso Nacional de Chile. (1999). Ley Nº 19.628 sobre Protección de la Vida Privada. Biblioteca del Congreso Nacional de Chile. https://www.bcn.cl/leychile/navegar?idNorma=141599
COPE Council. (2023). Position statement: Authorship and AI tools. Committee on Publication Ethics. https://publicationethics.org/cope-position-statements/ai-author
Council for International Organizations of Medical Sciences. (2016). International ethical guidelines for health-related research involving humans. CIOMS/WHO. https://cioms.ch/publications/product/international-ethical-guidelines-for-health-related-research-involving-humans/
Cuadrado-García, M., & Montoro-Pons, J. D. (2025). Arts and cultural consumption and diversity research: A bibliometric analysis. Poetics, 109, Article 101972. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.poetic.2025.101972
Escobar Arellano, C., Martínez Pompilio, A. C., & Zenteno-Gatica, S. (2025). Barreras y facilitadores de la participación cultural de personas con discapacidad en Chile: una mirada desde la accesibilidad y la política pública. Revista Española de Discapacidad, 13(1), 199–224. https://doi.org/10.5569/23405104.13.01.09
Ferri, D., & Leahy, A. (2025). Dismantling barriers and advancing the right of persons with disabilities to participate in cultural life: A socio-legal analysis. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781032619361
Field, A. (2018) Discovering Statistics Using IBM SPSS Statistics. 5th Edition, Sage, Newbury Park. (sin ciudad)
Finkel R. & Dashper, K. (2020) Accessibility, diversity and inclusion in events in Page, S.J., & Connell, J. (Eds.). (2020). The Routledge Handbook of Events (2nd ed.). Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429280993
Groves, R. M., Fowler, F. J., Couper, M. P., Lepkowski, J. M., Singer, E., & Tourangeau, R. (2009). Survey methodology (2nd ed.). Wiley.
Hollander, M., Wolfe, D. A., & Chicken, E. (2013). Nonparametric statistical methods (3rd ed.). Wiley.
Holm, S. (1979). A simple sequentially rejective multiple test procedure. Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, 6(2), 65–70.
Kovačić, S., Pivac, T., Solarević, M., Blešić, I., Cimbaljević, M., Vujičić, M., Stankov, U., Besermenji, S., & Ćurčić, N. (2024). Let us hear the voice of the audience: Groups facing the risk of cultural exclusion and cultural accessibility in Vojvodina province, Serbia. Universal Access in the Information Society, 23, 1595–1611. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10209-024-01102-5
Leahy, A., & Ferri, D. (2022). Barriers and facilitators to cultural participation by people with disabilities: A narrative literature review. Scandinavian Journal of Disability Research, 24(1), 68–81. https://doi.org/10.16993/sjdr.863
Leahy, A., & Ferri, D. (2024). Rethinking and advancing a ‘bottom-up’ approach to cultural participation of persons with disabilities as key to realising inclusive equality. International Journal of Law in Context, 20(2), 267–285. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1744552324000041
Ma, G. Y. K. (2024). An ecological approach to self-reflections on the inaccessibility of arts and cultural activities to wheelchair users. Disability & Society, 39(5), 1276–1296. https://doi.org/10.1080/09687599.2022.2142522
Mamattah, S., McGillivray, D., & McPherson, G. (2024). Festivals, events and equality, diversity & inclusion outcomes: An evidence review. University of the West of Scotland. https://spiritof2012.org.uk/
McGillivray, D., Colombo, A., & Villanueva, X. (2022). Tensions and disputes over public space in festival cities: Insights from Barcelona and Edinburgh. Journal of Policy Research in Tourism, Leisure and Events, 14(3), 229–241. https://doi.org/10.1080/19407963.2022.2032109
Ministerio de Desarrollo Social y Familia. (2023). III Estudio Nacional de la Discapacidad en Chile. Servicio Nacional de la Discapacidad (Senadis). RIL Editores. ISBN: 978-956-8441-08-1.
Montecinos, C., & Calderón, J. (2021). Arriba del escenario: La historia de los megaconciertos en Chile (1ª ed.). RIL Editores.
Muhib, F. B., Lin, L. S., Stueve, A., et al. (2001). A venue-based method for sampling hard-to-reach populations. Public Health Reports, 116(Suppl 1), 216–222.
Mulder, M., & Hitters, E. (2021). Visiting pop concerts and festivals: measuring the value of an integrated live music motivation scale. Cultural Trends, 30:4, 355-375. doi:10.1080/09548963.2021.1916738
Naciones Unidas. (2006). Convención sobre los Derechos de las Personas con Discapacidad. Naciones Unidas. https://www.un.org/disabilities/documents/convention/convoptprot-e.pdf
Norman, G. (2010). Likert scales, levels of measurement and the “laws” of statistics. Advances in Health Sciences Education, 15(5), 625–632.
Preston, C. C., & Colman, A. M. (2000). Optimal number of response categories in rating scales: Reliability, validity, discriminating power, and respondent preferences. Acta Psychologica, 104(1), 1–15.
Reyes-Martínez, J., Heredia-Carroza, J., Bérubé, J., & Acosta-Gijón, D. (2025). Inclusive policies in performing arts: a case study of Chile’s approach to disability. Journal of Policy Research in Tourism, Leisure and Events. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/19407963.2025.2468509
Šubic, N., & Ferri, D. (2023). National disability strategies as rights-based cultural policy tools. International Journal of Cultural Policy, 29(4), 467–483. https://doi.org/10.1080/10286632.2022.2053960
Willis, G. B. (2011). Cognitive interviewing: A tool for improving questionnaire design. Sage.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Relatos Journal
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
